Routing-protocol: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Zur Navigation springen
Zur Suche springen
Glenn (Diskussion | Beiträge) (+kat) |
|||
| (5 dazwischenliegende Versionen von 3 Benutzern werden nicht angezeigt) | |||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| − | <h2> | + | [[Kategorie:Terms]] |
| + | [[Kategorie:Howto]] | ||
| + | <h2>where do we go? </h2> | ||
| − | + | '''the problem:''' in a growing wireless network there will be the situation that a node will have to be routed over a number of other nodes to reach its destination-node (multi-hop-routing). | |
| − | |||
| − | the | + | '''the alternatives:''' |
| + | |||
| + | * BGP/RIP/[[OSPF]] - centralized quagga/zebra servers propagate existing routes | ||
| + | * [[Meshed Routing]] - a novel way of ad-hoc routing, nodes modify their routing tables independently | ||
| + | * [[WDS]] - Wireless-Distribution-System, all nodes act as APs and form one big subnet via WDS-Links | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Kategorie:Rechnernetz]] | ||
Aktuelle Version vom 9. März 2008, 21:16 Uhr
where do we go?
the problem: in a growing wireless network there will be the situation that a node will have to be routed over a number of other nodes to reach its destination-node (multi-hop-routing).
the alternatives:
- BGP/RIP/OSPF - centralized quagga/zebra servers propagate existing routes
- Meshed Routing - a novel way of ad-hoc routing, nodes modify their routing tables independently
- WDS - Wireless-Distribution-System, all nodes act as APs and form one big subnet via WDS-Links